Resolved Cases

Zakikhani et. al. v. Hyundai Motor Company et. al. 8:20-cv-01584-SB-JDE, (CD CA)

Jonathan Jagher served as Plaintiff’s counsel in this nationwide…

August 18, 2023/by Douglas Millen

In re Procter & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing and Sales Practice Litigation, 2:22-MD-3025 (SD OH)

Jonathan Jagher was recently appointed as a Settlement Class…

June 16, 2023/by Douglas Millen

Powe v. Dermalogica, LLC, 2022-LA-000874 (Circuit Ct. DuPage County, Illinois)

Freed Kanner Partner Jonathan Jagher was appointed as Co-Lead…

June 16, 2023/by Douglas Millen

Clarke et. al. v. Lemonade Inc. et. al., 2022LA000308 (Circuit Ct. DuPage County, Illinois)

$4 Million recovered for the Class

June 16, 2023/by Douglas Millen

In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litigation, 4:09-CV-1967 (N.D. Cal.)

$40 Million recovered for the Class

February 1, 2011/by Jeff Baer

SchagrinGas Co. v. BP Products North America, et al., No. 1:06-cv-3621 (N.D. Ill.)

$50 Million recovered for the Class

April 1, 2009/by Jeff Baer

In re Optical Disk Drive (ODD) Antitrust Litigation, MDL 2143 (N.D. Cal.)

$180 Million recovered for the Class

February 20, 2009/by Jeff Baer

Kleen Products, Inc. et al. v. International Paper, et al., 10-CV-5711 (N.D. Ill.) (“Containerboard Antitrust Litigation”)

$376 Million recovered for the Class

February 12, 2009/by Jeff Baer

In re Blood Reagents Antitrust Litigation, MDL 2081 (E.D. Pa.)

$41.5 Million recovered for the Class

February 6, 2009/by Jeff Baer

In re Fresh and Process Potatoes Antitrust Litigation, MDL 2186 (D. Idaho)

$25 Million recovered for the Class

January 4, 2009/by Jeff Baer

Standard Iron Works v. ArcelorMittal et al., 08-CV-5214 (N.D. Ill.)

$194 Million recovered for the Class

January 27, 2008/by Jeff Baer

In re Aftermarket Filters Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1957 (N.D. Ill.)

$18 Million recovered for the Class

January 13, 2008/by Jeff Baer

In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1917 (N.D. Cal.)

$224 Million recovered for the Class

October 3, 2007/by Jeff Baer

In re Flat Glass Antitrust Litigation (No. II), MDL 1942 (W.D. Pa.)

$22 Million recovered for the Class

September 21, 2007/by Jeff Baer

In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1940 (S.D.N.Y.)

$100 Million recovered for the Class

September 20, 2007/by Jeff Baer

In re Ocean Shipping Antitrust Litigation, MDL 395 (S.D.N.Y.)

$79 Million recovered for the Class

August 25, 2007/by Jeff Baer

In re Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1542 (D. Conn.)

$87 Million recovered for the Class

August 15, 2007/by Jeff Baer

In re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1486 (N.D. Cal.)

$330 Million recovered for the Class

August 1, 2007/by Jeff Baer

In re Urethane Chemicals Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1616 (D. Kan.)

$18 Million Recovered for the Class

July 1, 2007/by Jeff Baer

In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antirust Litigation, MDL 1682 (E.D. Pa.)

$97 Million recovered for the Class

June 1, 2007/by Jeff Baer

In re Methyl Methacrylate (MMA) Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1768 (E.D. Pa.)

$15 Million recovered for the Class

May 1, 2007/by Jeff Baer

In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1775 (E.D.N.Y.)

$1.2 Billion recovered for the Class

March 1, 2007/by Jeff Baer

In re Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1819 (N.D. Cal.)

$76 Million recovered for the Class

February 1, 2007/by Jeff Baer

In re Unisys Securities Litigation, CA No. 99-5333 (E.D. Pa.)

$20 Million recovered for the Class

September 1, 2006/by Jeff Baer

In re Industrial Gas Antitrust Litigation, CA No. 80 C. 3479 (N.D. Ill.)

$50 Million recovered for the Class

July 1, 2006/by Jeff Baer

In re Drill Bits Antitrust Litigation, CA No. H-91-627 (S.D. Tex.)

$52 Million recovered for the Class

June 1, 2006/by Jeff Baer

Blinder Robinson Securities Litigation (E.D. Pa.)

$71 Million recovered for the Class

May 1, 2006/by Jeff Baer

In re Waste Management, Inc. Securities Litigation, Master File 97-CV-7709 (N.D. Ill.)

$220 Million recovered for the Class

April 1, 2006/by Jeff Baer

In re Rubber Chemicals Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1648 (N.D. Cal.)

$300 Million recovered for the Class

March 1, 2006/by Jeff Baer

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1285 (D.D.C.)

$1.3 Billion recovered for the Class

February 1, 2006/by Jeff Baer

Koch Gathering Systems, Inc. Oil Spill Litigation (Dist. Ct. of Nueces County, Tex.)

$10 Million recovered for the Class

January 1, 2006/by Jeff Baer

In re Texas Bread Antitrust Litigation

$32 Million recovered for the Class

December 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re Public Service Company of New Mexico (S.D. Cal.)

$33 Million recovered for the Class

November 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re M-L Lee Acquisition Fund Securities Litigation (D. Del.)

$33 Million recovered for the Class

October 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re Morrison Knudson Securities Litigation, CA No. 94-CV-3345 (D. Idaho)

$43 Million recovered for the Class

September 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re Carbon Dioxide Antitrust Litigation, MDL 940 (M.D. Fla.)

$53 Million recovered for the Class

August 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re Isostatic Graphite Antitrust Litigation, Master File 00-CV-1857 (E.D. Pa.)

$11 Million recovered for the Class

July 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re Chubb Drought Insurance Litigation, MDL 782 (S.D. Ohio)

$118 Million recovered for the Class

June 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re Infant Formula Antitrust Litigation, MDL 878 (N.D. Fla.)

$125 Million recovered for the Class

May 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1261 (E.D. Pa.)

$200 Million recovered for the Class

April 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1087 (C.D. Ill.)

$531 Million

March 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re Clozapine Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 874 (N.D. Ill.)

$20 Million

February 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation, MDL 997 (N.D. Ill.)

$715 Million recovered for the Class

January 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

Our mission is to use our extensive class action expertise to level
the playing field for victims of corporate misconduct and maximize
the recovery of their financial losses. If you believe that you
may have a such a claim, contact us.

Get in touch

Resolved Cases

Zakikhani et. al. v. Hyundai Motor Company et. al. 8:20-cv-01584-SB-JDE, (CD CA)

In re Procter & Gamble Aerosol Products Marketing and Sales Practice Litigation, 2:22-MD-3025 (SD OH)

Powe v. Dermalogica, LLC, 2022-LA-000874 (Circuit Ct. DuPage County, Illinois)

Clarke et. al. v. Lemonade Inc. et. al., 2022LA000308 (Circuit Ct. DuPage County, Illinois)

Kent et. al. v. Women’s Health USA, Inc., FST-CV21-6054676-S (CT.Sup.Ct.)

Jones et. al. v. Lemonade Inc. 1:21-cv-04513 (N.D. IL.)

In Re: Morgan Stanley Data Security Litigation, 1:20-CV-05914 (S.D. N.Y.)

In Re: TikTok, Inc., Consumer Privacy Litigation, MDL No. 2948 (N.D. Ill.)

In re: Peanut Farmers Antitrust Litig. 2:19-cv-00463 (E.D. Va.)

Cameron et al v. Apple Inc. 4:19-cv-03074 (N.D.Ca.)

In re Lithium Ion Batteries Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2420 (N.D. Cal.)

In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing Litigation, 4:09-CV-1967 (N.D. Cal.)

SchagrinGas Co. v. BP Products North America, et al., No. 1:06-cv-3621 (N.D. Ill.)

In re Optical Disk Drive (ODD) Antitrust Litigation, MDL 2143 (N.D. Cal.)

Kleen Products, Inc. et al. v. International Paper, et al., 10-CV-5711 (N.D. Ill.) (“Containerboard Antitrust Litigation”)

In re Blood Reagents Antitrust Litigation, MDL 2081 (E.D. Pa.)

In re Fresh and Process Potatoes Antitrust Litigation, MDL 2186 (D. Idaho)

Standard Iron Works v. ArcelorMittal et al., 08-CV-5214 (N.D. Ill.)

In re Aftermarket Filters Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1957 (N.D. Ill.)

In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1917 (N.D. Cal.)

In re Flat Glass Antitrust Litigation (No. II), MDL 1942 (W.D. Pa.)

In re Municipal Derivatives Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1940 (S.D.N.Y.)

In re Ocean Shipping Antitrust Litigation, MDL 395 (S.D.N.Y.)

In re Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1542 (D. Conn.)

In re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1486 (N.D. Cal.)

In re Urethane Chemicals Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1616 (D. Kan.)

In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antirust Litigation, MDL 1682 (E.D. Pa.)

In re Methyl Methacrylate (MMA) Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1768 (E.D. Pa.)

In re Air Cargo Shipping Services Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1775 (E.D.N.Y.)

In re Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1819 (N.D. Cal.)

In re Unisys Securities Litigation, CA No. 99-5333 (E.D. Pa.)

In re Industrial Gas Antitrust Litigation, CA No. 80 C. 3479 (N.D. Ill.)

In re Drill Bits Antitrust Litigation, CA No. H-91-627 (S.D. Tex.)

Blinder Robinson Securities Litigation (E.D. Pa.)

In re Waste Management, Inc. Securities Litigation, Master File 97-CV-7709 (N.D. Ill.)

In re Rubber Chemicals Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1648 (N.D. Cal.)

In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1285 (D.D.C.)

Koch Gathering Systems, Inc. Oil Spill Litigation (Dist. Ct. of Nueces County, Tex.)

In re Texas Bread Antitrust Litigation

In re Public Service Company of New Mexico (S.D. Cal.)

In re M-L Lee Acquisition Fund Securities Litigation (D. Del.)

In re Morrison Knudson Securities Litigation, CA No. 94-CV-3345 (D. Idaho)

In re Carbon Dioxide Antitrust Litigation, MDL 940 (M.D. Fla.)

In re Isostatic Graphite Antitrust Litigation, Master File 00-CV-1857 (E.D. Pa.)

In re Chubb Drought Insurance Litigation, MDL 782 (S.D. Ohio)

In re Infant Formula Antitrust Litigation, MDL 878 (N.D. Fla.)

In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1261 (E.D. Pa.)

In re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1087 (C.D. Ill.)

In re Clozapine Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 874 (N.D. Ill.)

In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation, MDL 997 (N.D. Ill.)

Our mission is to use our extensive class action expertise to levelthe playing field for victims of corporate misconduct and maximizethe recovery of their financial losses. If you believe that youmay have a such a claim, contact us.

Our mission is to use our extensive class action expertise to level
the playing field for victims of corporate misconduct and maximize
the recovery of their financial losses. If you believe that you
may have a such a claim, contact us.