Leadership – Antitrust and Class Action Litigation

Appointments

As Lead or Co-Lead Counsel

In re: Fragrance End-User Plaintiff Antitrust Litigation, 2:23-cv-01627 (D.N.J.)

Active Case

July 3, 2024/by Douglas Millen

Murphy, et al. v. Toyota Motor Corp. et al., Consolidated Case No. 4:21-cv-00178-ALM (E.D. Tex.)

Settlement Pending Final Approval

August 6, 2021/by Douglas Millen

In re: Peanut Farmers Antitrust Litig. 2:19-cv-00463 (E.D. Va.)

$102.75 Million recovered for the Class

February 10, 2020/by Douglas Millen

In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1720 (MKB) (JO)

Active Case

December 19, 2019/by Douglas Millen

Daniel Gordon, et al. v. Amadeus IT Group S.A., et al., 1:15-cv-05457 (S.D.N.Y.) (“GDS Antitrust Litigation”)

Active Case

March 1, 2015/by Jeff Baer

In re Opana ER Antitrust Litigation, MDL 2580 (N.D. Ill.)

FKLM served as interim co-lead counsel on behalf of indirect…

January 1, 2015/by Jeff Baer

SchagrinGas Co. v. BP Products North America, et al., No. 1:06-cv-3621 (N.D. Ill.)

$50 Million recovered for the Class

April 1, 2009/by Jeff Baer

In re Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation, MDL 2311 (E.D. Mich.)

Active Case

March 1, 2009/by Jeff Baer

Kleen Products, Inc. et al. v. International Paper, et al., 10-CV-5711 (N.D. Ill.) (“Containerboard Antitrust Litigation”)

$376 Million recovered for the Class

February 12, 2009/by Jeff Baer

Koch Gathering Systems, Inc. Oil Spill Litigation (Dist. Ct. of Nueces County, Tex.)

$10 Million recovered for the Class

January 1, 2006/by Jeff Baer

In re Texas Bread Antitrust Litigation

$32 Million recovered for the Class

December 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re Public Service Company of New Mexico (S.D. Cal.)

$33 Million recovered for the Class

November 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re M-L Lee Acquisition Fund Securities Litigation (D. Del.)

$33 Million recovered for the Class

October 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re Morrison Knudson Securities Litigation, CA No. 94-CV-3345 (D. Idaho)

$43 Million recovered for the Class

September 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re Carbon Dioxide Antitrust Litigation, MDL 940 (M.D. Fla.)

$53 Million recovered for the Class

August 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re Isostatic Graphite Antitrust Litigation, Master File 00-CV-1857 (E.D. Pa.)

$11 Million recovered for the Class

July 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re Chubb Drought Insurance Litigation, MDL 782 (S.D. Ohio)

$118 Million recovered for the Class

June 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re Infant Formula Antitrust Litigation, MDL 878 (N.D. Fla.)

$125 Million recovered for the Class

May 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1261 (E.D. Pa.)

$200 Million recovered for the Class

April 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1087 (C.D. Ill.)

$531 Million

March 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re Clozapine Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 874 (N.D. Ill.)

$20 Million

February 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation, MDL 997 (N.D. Ill.)

$715 Million recovered for the Class

January 1, 2005/by Jeff Baer

Our mission is to use our extensive class action expertise to level
the playing field for victims of corporate misconduct and maximize
the recovery of their financial losses. If you believe that you
may have a such a claim, contact us.

Get in touch

Appointments

In re: Fragrance End-User Plaintiff Antitrust Litigation, 2:23-cv-01627 (D.N.J.)

Murphy, et al. v. Toyota Motor Corp. et al., Consolidated Case No. 4:21-cv-00178-ALM (E.D. Tex.)

In re: Peanut Farmers Antitrust Litig. 2:19-cv-00463 (E.D. Va.)

In re Payment Card Interchange Fee and Merchant Discount Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1720 (MKB) (JO)

Daniel Gordon, et al. v. Amadeus IT Group S.A., et al., 1:15-cv-05457 (S.D.N.Y.) (“GDS Antitrust Litigation”)

In re Opana ER Antitrust Litigation, MDL 2580 (N.D. Ill.)

SchagrinGas Co. v. BP Products North America, et al., No. 1:06-cv-3621 (N.D. Ill.)

In re Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation, MDL 2311 (E.D. Mich.)

Kleen Products, Inc. et al. v. International Paper, et al., 10-CV-5711 (N.D. Ill.) (“Containerboard Antitrust Litigation”)

In re Aftermarket Filters Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1957 (N.D. Ill.)

In re Flat Glass Antitrust Litigation (No. II), MDL 1942 (W.D. Pa.)

In re Pharmacy Benefit Managers Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 1782 (E.D. Pa.)

In re Ocean Shipping Antitrust Litigation, MDL 395 (S.D.N.Y.)

In re Urethane Chemicals Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1616 (D. Kan.)

In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antirust Litigation, MDL 1682 (E.D. Pa.)

In re Methyl Methacrylate (MMA) Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1768 (E.D. Pa.)

Koch Gathering Systems, Inc. Oil Spill Litigation (Dist. Ct. of Nueces County, Tex.)

In re Texas Bread Antitrust Litigation

In re Public Service Company of New Mexico (S.D. Cal.)

In re M-L Lee Acquisition Fund Securities Litigation (D. Del.)

In re Morrison Knudson Securities Litigation, CA No. 94-CV-3345 (D. Idaho)

In re Carbon Dioxide Antitrust Litigation, MDL 940 (M.D. Fla.)

In re Isostatic Graphite Antitrust Litigation, Master File 00-CV-1857 (E.D. Pa.)

In re Chubb Drought Insurance Litigation, MDL 782 (S.D. Ohio)

In re Infant Formula Antitrust Litigation, MDL 878 (N.D. Fla.)

In re Linerboard Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1261 (E.D. Pa.)

In re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation, MDL 1087 (C.D. Ill.)

In re Clozapine Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 874 (N.D. Ill.)

In re Brand Name Prescription Drugs Antitrust Litigation, MDL 997 (N.D. Ill.)

Our mission is to use our extensive class action expertise to levelthe playing field for victims of corporate misconduct and maximizethe recovery of their financial losses. If you believe that youmay have a such a claim, contact us.

Our mission is to use our extensive class action expertise to level
the playing field for victims of corporate misconduct and maximize
the recovery of their financial losses. If you believe that you
may have a such a claim, contact us.